Author: Albert Silver
Date: 05:47:53 02/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2001 at 10:41:26, Ed Panek wrote:
> HEre are some generic benchmarks for the most current CPU's
>
>Ed
>
Are the Athlon's referred to here Thunderbirds?
Albert
>
>
>AMD Athlon 1.2GHz (100%)
>Intel Pentium 4 1.5 GHz (98%)
>PowerMac G4 733 (97%)
>Intel Xeon III 1GHz (91%)
>Intel Pentium III 1GHz (86%)
>AMD Athlon 1GHz (82%)
>Intel Pentium III 866 (76%)
>AMD Duron 850 (74%)
>AMD Athlon 800 (71%)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On February 20, 2001 at 01:52:37, Richard A. Fowell wrote:
>
>>I see at http://store.apple.com/ that I can order a 733 MHz G4,
>>which should do pretty well with HIARCS 7.0. It would be
>>interesting to see HIARCS 7.0 benchmarks on the Athlon 1200
>>and the 733 MHz G4.
>>
>>Richard
>>
>>
>>On February 19, 2001 at 17:47:53, Shep wrote:
>>
>>>On February 19, 2001 at 13:57:58, Joseph Merolle wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Even though mac computers are not populer , they are considered by experts a
>>>>superior machien and much much faster. How come there has not been any games
>>>>from mac in computer vs gm play. Also how come they are never used in any
>>>>computer chess wars. i would love to see if there is a diferents in ratings
>>>>beteen the top mac computers and top ibm compatible computers useing all the top
>>>>programs. However i realize that top programs are not comming out with mac
>>>>compatible programs but i wonder if you can discover tommarows chess tecnology
>>>>using macs today.
>>>
>>>On my G3-233 at work, Hiarcs 7.0 hits around 40 knps (if my memory is correct),
>>>that's about the speed of a 400 MHz PII (since it hits around 60 knps on my
>>>PIII-550s). The fastest Mac around (the G4-500) will probably perform relatively
>>>better (been too lazy to check :), but likely not be faster than an Athlon 1200
>>>for chess.
>>>
>>>---
>>>Shep
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.