Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 07:30:47 02/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2001 at 10:20:31, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 22, 2001 at 09:52:19, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>Hi there, >> >>IPCCC 2001 Paderborn >>http://www.uni-paderborn.de/~IPCCC/ >> >>My information by Thomas Mayer, Quark programmer (have the handy number) ! >> >>here the results for round 4: >> >>Gromit 3.8- Deep Shredder, 0:1 >>Nimzo 8.0 - ZChess 2.23 ½:½ (remis after the opening) >>Ikarus 0.24 - Gandalf 4.32h 0:1 >>Deep Fritz - Comet B31, ½:½ >>Deep SOS - P. ConNerS 1:0 >>Yace 0.99.x - Matador 1:0 >>Diep 2.0 - IsiChess x 1:0 >>Quark 1.20 - Deep Patzer 3.35 0:1 >>Holmes 0.74 elo :-) - Neurologic x ½:½ >> >>Hm, Shredder won the endgame in a Remis position, I have no replay the match. > >I do not think that the position was Remis. > >I believe that the programmers should learn more about chess. > >The position was KRBB vs KRBP and I do not think it is a draw because having >pair of bishops is a big advantage and the side with them can use them for mate >threats. > >Uri Hi Uri, I read here all your messages, I think you are a very strong chess player. I have not the time for replay the games. BTW: All games are available from round to round on the IPCCC webpage. http://www.uni-paderborn.de/~IPCCC/ I have my information from Thomas Mayer. Thomas say to me that Shredder standig better but the programmers thinking it is a remis position or Shredder is winning, more a remis position (time was 14:15). Best Frank Hope to read more comments from you ... it is very interesting ! Thanks !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.