Author: Albert Silver
Date: 07:48:31 02/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2001 at 10:30:47, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>On February 22, 2001 at 10:20:31, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On February 22, 2001 at 09:52:19, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>>
>>>Hi there,
>>>
>>>IPCCC 2001 Paderborn
>>>http://www.uni-paderborn.de/~IPCCC/
>>>
>>>My information by Thomas Mayer, Quark programmer (have the handy number) !
>>>
>>>here the results for round 4:
>>>
>>>Gromit 3.8- Deep Shredder, 0:1
>>>Nimzo 8.0 - ZChess 2.23 ½:½ (remis after the opening)
>>>Ikarus 0.24 - Gandalf 4.32h 0:1
>>>Deep Fritz - Comet B31, ½:½
>>>Deep SOS - P. ConNerS 1:0
>>>Yace 0.99.x - Matador 1:0
>>>Diep 2.0 - IsiChess x 1:0
>>>Quark 1.20 - Deep Patzer 3.35 0:1
>>>Holmes 0.74 elo :-) - Neurologic x ½:½
>>>
>>>Hm, Shredder won the endgame in a Remis position, I have no replay the match.
>>
>>I do not think that the position was Remis.
>>
>>I believe that the programmers should learn more about chess.
>>
>>The position was KRBB vs KRBP and I do not think it is a draw because having
>>pair of bishops is a big advantage and the side with them can use them for mate
>>threats.
>>
>>Uri
>
>Hi Uri,
>
>I read here all your messages, I think you are a very strong chess player. I
>have not the time for replay the games.
>
>BTW:
>All games are available from round to round on the IPCCC webpage.
>http://www.uni-paderborn.de/~IPCCC/
>
>I have my information from Thomas Mayer. Thomas say to me that Shredder standig
>better but the programmers thinking it is a remis position or Shredder is
>winning, more a remis position (time was 14:15).
>
>Best
>Frank
>
>
>Hope to read more comments from you ... it is very interesting !
>Thanks !
For the record, I completely agree with Uri. 2 bishops and a rook are a very
ugly combination to fight against, and see no reason at all to think this should
draw.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.