Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:50:15 02/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2001 at 07:37:24, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On February 23, 2001 at 01:56:13, Ferdinand S. Mosca wrote: > >> >>Yace 0.99.08 - P.ConNerS (0-1) >>IPCC-2001, Paderborn (2), 21.02.2001 >> >>[D]8/4k1p1/5p2/KP6/P7/4r2p/3R4/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Probably the point where Yace could have drawn the game. >>Black's last move is 41...h3 and Yace responded with 42. b6?! >> >>Is there any program that considers 42.Rb2? > >This is what Gandalf thinks. About the same result as Xinix I think. > >Analysis by Gandalf 4.32g: > >1.b6 Rb3 > µ (-1.29) Depth: 2 00:00:01 >1.Rh2 > µ (-1.27) Depth: 2 00:00:01 >1.Rh2 g5 > µ (-1.26) Depth: 2 00:00:01 >1.Rh2 g5 2.Kb6 > µ (-0.96) Depth: 3 00:00:01 >1.Rh2 g5 2.b6 g4 > -+ (-2.83) Depth: 4 00:00:01 >1.b6 > -+ (-2.81) Depth: 4 00:00:01 >1.b6 Rb3 2.Ka6 g5 > µ (-1.32) Depth: 4 00:00:01 >1.Ka6 > µ (-1.31) Depth: 4 00:00:01 >1.b6 g5 2.b7 Rb3 3.Re2+ Kd6 4.Ka6 > µ (-1.34) Depth: 5 00:00:01 6kN >1.b6 > µ (-0.95) Depth: 6 00:00:01 21kN >1.b6 Rb3 2.Ka6 g5 3.a5 g4 > ³ (-0.64) Depth: 6 00:00:01 21kN >1.b6 Rb3 2.Ka6 g5 3.Re2+ Kd6 4.Rd2+ Kc6 5.a5 > µ (-1.07) Depth: 7 00:00:01 61kN >1.b6 Rb3 2.Ka6 g5 3.Re2+ Kd6 4.Rd2+ Kc6 5.Rc2+ Kd5 > µ (-0.94) Depth: 8 00:00:01 135kN >1.b6 Rb3 2.Ka6 g5 3.a5 g4 4.Kb7 g3 5.a6 > µ (-1.36) Depth: 9 00:00:02 372kN >1.Rb2 > µ (-1.34) Depth: 9 00:00:03 372kN >1.Rb2 Re5 2.Ka6 Rh5 3.Rb1 h2 4.Re1+ Kd6 5.Rh1 g5 > µ (-1.29) Depth: 9 00:00:05 372kN >1.Rb2 Re5 2.Ka6 Rh5 3.Re2+ Kd6 4.b6 g5 5.Rd2+ Kc6 > µ (-1.07) Depth: 10 00:00:08 1574kN >1.b6 > µ (-1.05) Depth: 10 00:00:09 1574kN >1.b6 Rb3 2.Ka6 g5 3.a5 g4 4.Ka7 g3 5.a6 Rxb6 > µ (-0.81) Depth: 10 00:00:10 1574kN >1.b6 Rb3 2.Ka6 g5 3.b7 g4 4.Rh2 Rb4 5.Ka7 Rxa4+ > µ (-1.18) Depth: 11 00:00:15 3309kN >1.Rb2 > µ (-1.16) Depth: 11 00:00:18 3309kN >1.b6 Rb3 2.Ka6 g5 3.b7 g4 4.Rh2 Rb4 5.Ka7 Rxa4+ > µ (-1.18) Depth: 12 00:00:53 10351kN >1.Rb2 > µ (-1.16) Depth: 12 00:01:03 10351kN >1.b6 > µ (-0.81) Depth: 13 00:02:12 24536kN >1.b6 Rb3 2.Rh2 g5 3.Ka6 g4 4.b7 Kd6 5.Ka7 Kc7 > = (0.00) Depth: 13 00:03:50 24536kN >1.b6 Rb3 2.Rh2 g5 3.Ka6 g4 4.b7 Kd6 5.Ka7 Kc7 > = (0.00) Depth: 14 00:07:47 76840kN > >Regards, >Mogens I think that Yace evaluation may be more interesting. At which point did Yace see that it is losing the game? My hardware is busy in analyzing other positions so I cannot analyze this position now. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.