Author: James Swafford
Date: 10:50:05 02/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2001 at 16:43:16, David Rasmussen wrote: >On February 22, 2001 at 16:05:46, James Swafford wrote: > >>Yes, really!!! I was surprised, too. The test was under WinNT. >>Dell laptop, PIII 750, 512 mb. >> >>I'm in a rush now, but I can posts some numbers later tonight. >> > >Well, as I've written elsewhere, I tried it with my own engine, and I saw the >usual gcc/MSVC difference of about 30%. So at least for me, it didn't work. And >I saw the same difference in speed as I've seen with Crafty and other programs >when compiled with gcc, so I have a hard time believing that cygwin is >significantly better than gcc, if better at all. I produced some msvc/cygwin test results (post above). Maybe I'll get a chance this weekend to compile with gcc on my RH 6.2 box. -- James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.