Author: Brian Kostick
Date: 12:07:20 02/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
Joshua,
For what it's worth here's results from my PIII-733, 1000 sec. max, 1 extra
ply, 256MB total RAM, running Marathon.cbh as found on the Fritz 6 CD:
Nimzo 8 - 64MB Result:196 out of 210 = 93% Ave. time = 25 sec.
Fritz6e - 64MB Result:194 out of 210 = 92% Ave. time = 52 sec.
Fritz6e -128MB Result:194 out of 210 = 92% Ave. time = 53 sec.
Nimzo 8 -128MB Result:193 out of 210 = 91% Ave. time = 27 sec.
Fritz 5.32-128MB Result:189 out of 210 = 90% Ave. time = 33 sec.
Fritz 5.23- 64MB Result:188 out of 210 = 89% Ave. time = 35 sec.
Note: The Nimzo 8-128MB run is tainted as I did not have the Nimzo 8.cmp file
present in the engines folder. I was in the process of consolidating everything
to run under the Fritz GUI and didn't move that file at first. I may run that
test again, and maybe 32MB Hash runs. (Otherwise the extra cycles go to SETI,
laughs) Brian K.
On February 23, 2001 at 10:49:24, Joshua Lee wrote:
>I am running many testsets and i noticed that the file on my 500mhz laptop was
>different so i manually ran a test and on my main computer i could run the test
>with 64, 128 or 184MB for Hash tables well if more is better than how come with
>64MB it solved a test but with 128 or more it actually took LONGER than the
>SLOWER computer!!!!!!!! I am running Windows 2000 and thought that a service
>might be running that doesn't need to be but i am not sure.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.