Author: john c cook
Date: 04:56:57 03/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
hi if you say fritz 5 is so good have you play cm5500 vs fritz 5 cm5500 beat fritz5 say 6 out 10 and i do not see cm5500 on ssdf talking about commercial interests i like you tell me how the number one program has a problem whit a $30 program i beat you work for fritz 5 On March 11, 1998 at 07:26:01, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On March 11, 1998 at 07:12:05, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>> >>>Let's see what some can invent now to disqualify both lists. >>> >>>Enrique >> >>My only point is, that normally SSDF and SS list have mostly same games >>so >>they are almost same list with may be different level (and of course >>Hiarcs is little better in SS list...) > >The whole mess started by disqualifying games autoplayed by Fritz 5. >Eric's list does not include them. Instead, it includes games played >manually by people other than SSDF and also by the SSDF. All manual. And >the end result is the same: Fritz 5 comes on top of both lists. > >Aside from this, Hiarcs 6 comes under Fritz 5 on Selective Search list. > >This anti-SSDF and anti-Fritz 5 campaign goes against all evidence and >is based on commercial interests. Ugly. > >Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.