Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 02:44:43 02/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2001 at 05:19:54, TEERAPONG TOVIRAT wrote: > >>and 16 make/unmake alternately. (sqrt(1*16) = 4). So maybe >>17/2 = 8.5 is better than 4? Why not measure these numbers instead > >The problem is we should use geometric mean ( y = sqrt (x)) >or arithmetic mean (y= x/2) . >I'm not sure. Perhaps, some math experts here can help. >However, I prefer geometric mean... >Thanks for you opinion. >Teerapong It is definitely the geometric mean for the branching factor. So in average you have (1 + 16) moves per 2 nodes. Then of course you must take the arithmetic mean to get 8.5 :) > > >>for your particular program since there are complications with >>hashtables and killers? >> >>But I agree on the fundamental idea. >> >>Ralf
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.