Author: Amicitia Stone
Date: 08:29:17 02/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2001 at 11:22:54, Albert Silver wrote: >On February 25, 2001 at 11:09:22, Amicitia Stone wrote: > >>On February 25, 2001 at 11:02:55, Pete Galati wrote: >> >>>On February 25, 2001 at 10:17:53, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>> >>>Now that you mention it, I don't know. But I have always heard that SMP >>>programs don't do as well as the non SMP versions on single CPU computers. >>> >>>It could be that Deep Fritz has a way around that, or it could be that Chessbase >>>claims that Deep Fritz is better on single cpu machines for no other reason than >>>they get to sell them for more. >>> >>>Are there tests (not by Chessbase!!) indicating that Deep Fritz is the stronger >>>program on single cpu computers? >>> >>>Pete >> >>Well I can test them. I have both, and I have a 500 P3. Of course, I would need >>10 million games all at tournament time control to prove anything :) > >Not really. Test them on a series of difficult positions requiring at least a >few minutes to resolve, and compare the results. The question is in how much the >engines differ though, apart from one being SMP and the other not. > > Albert Hi Albert, Ok sure I can do that. Do you have any suggestions for "difficult positions"
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.