Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 09:31:25 02/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2001 at 12:18:18, Uri Blass wrote: >I think that it may be a good idea to use some fixed positions similiar to the >nunn match for autoplayer games(I do not suggest the nunn match position because >they are known positions and it is better to use positions after 10-15 moves >from grandmasters games). > >Uri the opposite uri: they could play from shuffle chess positions. this way the programs had to play from sero ! and we would measure the engine and not book parameters. computerchess lines are stupid for machine chess. 2 worlds. in human chess, the side wins the opponent made the last mistake. human chess is decided by very short mistakes. the level of humans increases the range of the mistakes. the quality IS to increase this range. computerchess is different. so why not shuffle chess ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.