Author: Tanya Deborah
Date: 10:34:39 02/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2001 at 11:20:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 25, 2001 at 11:02:55, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On February 25, 2001 at 10:17:53, Uri Blass wrote: >> >> >>Now that you mention it, I don't know. But I have always heard that SMP >>programs don't do as well as the non SMP versions on single CPU computers. > >I did not hear it. > >Chessbase claims that Deep Fritz has knowledge that Fritz6 does not have and the >fact that Deep Fritz is an SMP programs proves nothing because you can choose >the number of proceessors to use. > >Deep Fritz is not similiar to Deep Junior when I read that you cannot choose the >number of processors to use and in this case Deep Junior is slower than Junior6. > >I know that the ssdf test Deep Fritz on one processor and they do not do it with >Deep Junior. > >The reason is clear. >There was no point in testing Deep Junior on a single CPU when nobody claimed >that it is stronger than Junior6 but there is a point in testing Deep Fritz on >single CPU because we need to know if deep fritz is better. > Hi Uri ! I believed that Deep Junior was a bit better than Junior6. Is a pity that Sddf is not interested in test Deep Junior. Why do you think about this Uri? and why is Deep Junior slower than Junior6? Is this that makes it weak than Junior6???? Tanya,D >I know that testers like Enrique claimed that Deep Fritz is better than >Fritz6a(Enrique claimed about 20 elo better). > >You can see also Deep Fritz's good result against nimzo8 in the ssdf games so I >guess that Deep Fritz is going to be number 1 in the next list. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.