Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:06:52 02/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2001 at 12:29:57, Ed Schröder wrote: >On February 25, 2001 at 12:18:18, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 25, 2001 at 11:56:08, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On February 25, 2001 at 11:04:52, Amicitia Stone wrote: >>> >>>>This is just the way I see things: >>>> >>>>Most impressive result: Yace 0.99x 5th place (Wonderful) >>>>runner-up: Comet B.31 7th place (Still had 5.0/9 just like Yace) >>> >>>Very good indeed.... >>> >>> >>>>Most disappointing result: Nimzo 8.0 11th place (What happend?!) >>>>runner-up: P. ConNerS 10th place (How many processors does this thing need to >>>>win?!) I expected more from it.... >>>> >>>>The team I feel most happy for: Deep Shredder 5.0 (Congrats!) >>>>runner-up: Holmes 0.74 (Nice try! I hope it was a good experience!) >>> >>>The pattern and story continues.... >>> >>> >>>>The team I feel bad for: Deep Fritz Paderborn (Soooo close! 2nd ain't bad!) >>>>runner-up: Nimzo 8.0 (obvious reasons. It wasn't even going to enter the >>>>tounament. I bet they regret it.) >>> >>> >>>Same pattern... >>> >>>Put it into the autoplayer and it wins every long match. >> Starting >>>slowly but in the end the learner gets the other computer opponent. >>> >> >>I do not see it in the ssdf match against Deep Fritz. > >Then have a look again. > >Ed I looked again and found in Deep Fritz-Nimzo8 23-10 so the autoplayer did not help Nimzo8 to get good results. see http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?155702 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.