Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 18:30:21 03/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 1998 at 13:59:25, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On March 10, 1998 at 13:48:50, Alessandro Morales wrote: > >>On March 10, 1998 at 07:57:05, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>Here are the latest P200MMX ratings provided by "Selective Magazine", of >>>Eric Hallsworth: >>> >>>2603 Fritz5 >>>2585 Hiarcs6 >>>2581 Nimzo98 >>>2579 Rebel9 >>>2570 MChess Pro7 >>> >>>Fritz 5 played manually, without the Powerbook. I understand Fritz 5 >>>played over 200 games. >>> >>>So much for the suspicions about the SSDF games. >>> >>>By the way, my own results are very similar to Eric's. >>> >>>Ratings by Eric, mine and SSDF fall well within the statistic margin of >>>error. >>> >>>Enrique >> >>I think that the only solution to obtain an accurate ELO is to let all >>best programs to play human 2h 40m tournaments... >> >>Alessandro Morales > >Of course, but where are these tournaments. > >Meanwhile, the SSDF list is the best we have. > >Enrique Most common + with the largest ammount of data, anyway. Nevertheless I allways like to look at Eric's list - there ARE interesting details added, just like in - or decrease with more/ less RAM - different CPU's. A lot of work - we shouldn't forget this, and the " brainchild " H6 is treated absolutely correct therein - but of course commented a little better - but that's normal. And referring to MORITZ' interesting letter : IF things don't come to a rapid calm down - it'll be the end of this list - this or that way, I'm quite sure 'bout that. One speakes about the "SSDF" - and " the list " - who really remembers all them testers, who still play by hand - spendin' time without donation - just for their hobby...and our common benefit ( least, until shortly...) If I were one of them, I'd say to myself : "....what the heck - let them do their testing alone....." ELVIS
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.