Author: Ferdinand S. Mosca
Date: 05:04:50 02/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2001 at 22:55:38, gerard sanchez wrote: > >I've been a regular user of CM serioes now starting from CM6000 to CM 8000. >One of the strongest attration to me about the CM series is the auto annotation >feature and I must say I am starting to consider, with the popularity of Fritz >especially here, that maybe there might be something better out there. > >I am a heavy user of the auto annotion feature and consider it my most useful >tool in getting a solid diagnosis on my positional and strategical weaknesses >and thus know the areas I should give more attention to. > >My question is for the people who have had the chance to use both Fritz and >Chessmaster. Which do you think does better annotation? > >Any input would be well appreciated. Thanks! Hi Gerard, Fritz is good for players with above 1800 elo rating. It would give not much text analysis, but variation moves and Chess Informant symbols which a beginner might not appreciate. It is able to give other games that is similar to the games you have let Fritz analyzed, useful when you are very particular about the opening's popularity or players that also use that opening. If you like I will post a game analyzed by Fritz. It is good you analyze your personal games, Dinan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.