Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 05:46:29 02/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2001 at 07:51:33, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >Well, I don't know what's a "moral winner". As a matter of fact, The gandalf >engine has terribly improved. No problem to cope with the hardware disadvantage >against the dual machines. You won't get any objection from here. There are no proper distinction between moral and immoral winners (or losers). >Without the bug, throwing away the game against Fritz, Gandalf could have been >the winner of this tourney. I agree with Uri's point. The draw would have been different, so you can't extrapolate the result. You don't need chaos theory to make that connection :-). Steen called it a Swiss-gambit. >Anyway, the 3rd rank is a big success, IMO. That we can agree upon. If you've changed the design of your program, it must be nice to know that you're on the right track. Something similar can be said about some of the other contestants, ie. Quark, Gromit, Yace and Comet (?). So when do we see the new Comet? Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.