Author: Harald Faber
Date: 06:50:55 02/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2001 at 15:06:52, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 25, 2001 at 12:29:57, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On February 25, 2001 at 12:18:18, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 25, 2001 at 11:56:08, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On February 25, 2001 at 11:04:52, Amicitia Stone wrote: >>>> >>>>>This is just the way I see things: >>>>> >>>>>Most impressive result: Yace 0.99x 5th place (Wonderful) >>>>>runner-up: Comet B.31 7th place (Still had 5.0/9 just like Yace) >>>> >>>>Very good indeed.... >>>> >>>> >>>>>Most disappointing result: Nimzo 8.0 11th place (What happend?!) >>>>>runner-up: P. ConNerS 10th place (How many processors does this thing need to >>>>>win?!) I expected more from it.... >>>>> >>>>>The team I feel most happy for: Deep Shredder 5.0 (Congrats!) >>>>>runner-up: Holmes 0.74 (Nice try! I hope it was a good experience!) >>>> >>>>The pattern and story continues.... >>>> >>>> >>>>>The team I feel bad for: Deep Fritz Paderborn (Soooo close! 2nd ain't bad!) >>>>>runner-up: Nimzo 8.0 (obvious reasons. It wasn't even going to enter the >>>>>tounament. I bet they regret it.) >>>> >>>> >>>>Same pattern... >>>> >>>>Put it into the autoplayer and it wins every long match. >>> Starting >>>>slowly but in the end the learner gets the other computer opponent. >>>> >>> >>>I do not see it in the ssdf match against Deep Fritz. >> >>Then have a look again. >> >>Ed > >I looked again and found in >Deep Fritz-Nimzo8 23-10 so the autoplayer did not help Nimzo8 to get good >results. > >see >http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?155702 > >Uri I think Ed meant DF, not Nimzo8, and certainly that DF-N8 was first very close and in the end went so clearly. Don't know if it was, don't have all that in mind.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.