Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 11:24:22 02/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2001 at 12:50:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 26, 2001 at 12:44:44, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 26, 2001 at 12:27:53, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On February 26, 2001 at 10:58:43, Pete Galati wrote: >>> >>>>On February 26, 2001 at 10:49:06, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 26, 2001 at 10:34:48, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>It is very strange but Nimzo 8 with the modified setting yielded a better result >>>>>>against Fritz 6e at G25 after 60 games than it does against Junior 6. >>>>>> >>>>>I forgot to include the number of draws, the score ended in W26 L18 D16 in >>>>>favor of Junior 6. I believe that Junior 6 is a bogie program which is about the >>>>>same or slightly stronger than Nimzo 8, but it always score better. >>>>> >>>>>>Pichard >>>> >>>>Considering the difference in style of games played by Fritz and Junior, I would >>>>expect them to do very different against a 3rd program (modified or not). I'd >>>>agree with Uri, you probably need to test it against as many different programs >>>>as you can. >>>> >>>>Pete >>> >>>I agree with all of you! >>>However, I have tested Junior 6 with Nimzo 8 and Deep Fritz, it's always the >>>same, Deep Fritz beats Nimzo 8 in _short_ matches with not a very immpressive >>>score. But Deep Fritz blows Junior 6 out of the water >> >>Not truth. >>Deep fritz-Junior6 10-10 in Enrique's tournament. >> >>, and Junior 6 always blows >>>Nimzo 8 out of the water. >> >>Also not truth. >> >>Nimzo8 won the match against Junior6 in enrique tournament if I remember >>correctly. >> >>Uri > >Maybe I was too aggresive and I apologize. >I believe that you got results that suggest that Deep fritz blows Junior when >Junior blows Nimzo. > >I guess that the reason for the different result is that luck is involved(or >maybe one engine was slowed down by some factor for some reason or you did not >use the right opening book for the programs). > >Uri Thank You for your apology. I certainly did'nt fabricate the results. I did say _SHORT_ matches. They used the same books, and yes, I'm sure there was some luck involved. They were all tested on the same machine, a 500MGH PIII with 128MB of SDRAM. They operated under the Fritz 6 GUI using engine match. They were all allocated 32MB for hash tables. The operating system was Win/98 with no additional programms wasting the cpus' time. I did the best I could do, having only one computer. Regards, Terry McCracken
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.