Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess strength of these programs?

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 08:40:27 03/12/98

Go up one level in this thread


>Thoralf, 99.9% of everyone  respects your hard work and that of your
>testers but if you don't require all autotest drivers to be made public
>before you test, I am afaid that your list is doomed because one by one
>the programmers will withdraw their public autotest drivers since
>Chessbase refuses to release theirs. You may end up in a situation where
>they send their secret autotest drivers to your organization. This will
>be a sad day for others who will want to autotest as well. Overtime,
>even the secret arrangement won't work because some will not trust that
>it will remain secret and thus your list will lose potential candidates.
>An SSDF list with only 1/2 the participants will lose its credibility. I
>believe that only the following will be work. All autotest drivers and
>all software be commercially available. The only other solution could be
>to accept opening book upgrades from the programmers at any time. I do
>not profess to tell you what to do but I would hate to see all your good
>work come to naught over the issue of secret autotesters.

Well said KK.

Equal chances gives an equal fight.

- Ed Schroder -



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.