Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: test results comparing cygwin, msvc binaries (long code attachment)

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 14:08:50 02/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On February 25, 2001 at 03:40:07, Severi Salminen wrote:

>>>I tried it, and it blew Watcom out of the water.  And Watcom (the last I
>>>tested it) was a bit faster on FP than MSVC.  I guess I ought to try it
>>>out on some of my old raytracing codes...
>>
>>You can also mix and max objects if you compile some with the MS compiler first.
>> There are lots of benefits to the Intel compiler.  I suspect tremendous
>>competition like that will get MS hopping to improve theirs also.
>
>Hi!
>
>I also downloaded Intel compiler. Allthough I couldn't improve the performance
>over MSVC yet, it looks very interesting - escpecially the profiler guided
>compilation. But did you say I can mix the usage of Intel compiler and Visual C
>compiler? How does this happen?

Compile the modules first with Microsoft C++.
Then, select the Intel C++ compiler and compile the modules one by one, linking
each time and performing a benchmark.

Also, using profile guided optimization, you can create a linker order response
file with the Intel compiler.  This file often helps the Microsoft compiler
create a faster binary, sometimes dramatically so.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.