Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess strength of these programs?

Author: Johan Havegheer

Date: 12:31:04 03/12/98

Go up one level in this thread


On March 12, 1998 at 01:37:02, Komputer Korner wrote:

>On March 03, 1998 at 05:20:23, Thoralf Karlsson wrote:
>
>>On March 03, 1998 at 00:59:02, Aaron  wrote:
>>
>>>Hello . I was wondering if someone could enlighten me about the relative
>>>chess strenghts of the following chess programs
>>>
>>>
>>>1) Virtual Chess 2. I have heard that this is a rather strong program.
>>>But Why isn't this program listed on the Swedish chess computer ratings
>>>lists?
>>
>>Two reasons: Because the programmers haven't sent any copies of Virtual
>>Chess 2 to SSDF for testing. SSDF cannot afford to buy several copies of
>>all new programs.
>>
>>Even if we received copies of Virtual Chess 2, we probably couldn't get
>>enough games (>100) since as far as I know you cannot use auto232 for
>>testing. Nowadays only a couple of our testers want to test manually.
>>
>>Thoralf Karlsson
>>SSDF
>
>Thoralf, 99.9% of everyone  respects your hard work and that of your
>testers but if you don't require all autotest drivers to be made public
>before you test, I am afaid that your list is doomed because one by one
>the programmers will withdraw their public autotest drivers since
>Chessbase refuses to release theirs. You may end up in a situation where
>they send their secret autotest drivers to your organization. This will
>be a sad day for others who will want to autotest as well. Overtime,
>even the secret arrangement won't work because some will not trust that
>it will remain secret and thus your list will lose potential candidates.
>An SSDF list with only 1/2 the participants will lose its credibility. I
>believe that only the following will be work. All autotest drivers and
>all software be commercially available. The only other solution could be
>to accept opening book upgrades from the programmers at any time. I do
>not profess to tell you what to do but I would hate to see all your good
>work come to naught over the issue of secret autotesters.

Yes KK , This is what i call GETTING TO the Point !




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.