Author: James T. Walker
Date: 07:08:56 02/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2001 at 17:38:58, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On February 26, 2001 at 17:15:18, Chessfun wrote: > >>On February 26, 2001 at 16:30:08, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>Here are 4 games played over the weekend on 2 Athlon 900Mhz/auto232 machines at >>>game/1 hour. Shredder did a job on the Tiger. (3-1) >> >>Despite Shredder 5's play in my current Valentine's tourney at 30'/3" inc >>autoplayed. My friend Chris Taylor has played 200 1 hour/side autoplayed games >>between Tiger 13 and Shredder 5 won by Shredder 113-87. Within the next couple >>of days I will have these from Chris for others to download. >> >>Seems Shredder is one of those programs that maybe performs better at longer >>controls, though I don't have enough blitz info to substantiate the statement. >> >>Sarah. > >Hi! > >Yes you are right, at least on a slow computer (450) S5 seems to be weaker than >Shredder4. So far I have only played 300 blitz games with S5 vs 3000 with S4. > >Bertil I have the same feeling. So far Shredder 5 is near the bottom of the Elo list in my "Blitz" database but near the top of my "Standard" Elo list. For some reason CM8K is showing similiar results but I have fewer games so can't tell yet. Jim Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.