Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess strength of these programs?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 17:45:40 03/12/98

Go up one level in this thread


On March 12, 1998 at 17:56:22, Amir Ban wrote:

>
>By the way, I'm not suspicious of the "standard" DOS autoplayer, even
>though I don't have source and don't know exactly what it does (I'm sure
>Bob Hyatt would like to know). One reason is that the author is above
>suspicion, but an even better one is that I don't know what an
>autoplayer can do to cheat.
>
>Amir

So far as I know, all the autoplayer does is cause me to pull my hair
out.  :)

However, I think there's a tad too much hysteria right now.  Some aren't
happy with Fritz at #1.  Others aren't happy with no public autoplayer
from Fritz although no one said a thing about genius 4 which also had no
public autoplayer + a different version for SSDF testing.

I think it is simply too emotional an issue.  I've been on top of the
computer chess heap.  I've been near the bottom.  I've been everywhere
in between.  The sun still rises tomorrow, and I still have just as much
fun today as I did when my program played it's very first move in
1968...




This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.