Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 15:21:03 03/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 01, 2001 at 18:05:47, Dieter Buerssner wrote:
>On March 01, 2001 at 16:25:01, Sune Larsson wrote:
>
>> 8/2b2pp1/K2p4/p4P2/P7/6P1/8/2k3B1 w - - 0 1
>>
>> Test: If your program is a flyer or a goose. The faster the better
>> But the evals should show that white is *winning*
>
>Yace, AMD K6-2 475, 20M hash:
>
> 3802999 16.412 0.12 13t 1.Kb7 Bd8 2.Bd4 Kc2 3.Bxg7 Kb3 4.Kc6 Kxa4 5.Kd7
> Bg5 6.Kxd6 Kb4 7.Kd5 {0}
> 4395087 18.736 0.12 13. 1.Kb7 Bd8 2.Bd4 Kc2 3.Bxg7 Kb3 4.Kc6 Kxa4 5.Kd7
> Bg5 6.Kxd6 Kb4 7.Kd5 {0}
> 5360419 22.618 0.24 14t 1.Kb7 Bd8 2.Bd4 Kc2 3.Bxg7 Kb3 4.Kc6 Kxa4
> 5.Kxd6 Kb4 6.Kd7 Bg5 7.Ke8 f6 8.g4 {0}
> 6838293 28.848 0.24 14. 1.Kb7 Bd8 2.Bd4 Kc2 3.Bxg7 Kb3 4.Kc6 Kxa4
> 5.Kxd6 Kb4 6.Kd7 Bg5 7.Ke8 f6 8.g4 {0}
> 8364249 35.077 0.44 15t 1.Kb7 Bd8 2.Bd4 Kc2 3.Bxg7 Kb3 4.Kc6 d5 5.Kxd5
> Be7 6.Ke5 Bd8 7.g4 Kxa4 8.Kd5 {0}
> 10975377 46.296 0.44 15. 1.Kb7 Bd8 2.Bd4 Kc2 3.Bxg7 Kb3 4.Kc6 d5 5.Kxd5
> Be7 6.Ke5 Bd8 7.g4 Kxa4 8.Kd5 {0}
> 14541245 1:02.2 0.35 16t 1.Kb7 Bd8 2.Bd4 Kc2 3.Bxg7 Kb3 4.Kc6 d5 5.Kxd5
> Be7 6.g4 Kxa4 7.Kc4 Bg5 8.Bd4 Bd2 {0}
> 22611885 1:37.5 0.35 16. 1.Kb7 Bd8 2.Bd4 Kc2 3.Bxg7 Kb3 4.Kc6 d5 5.Kxd5
> Be7 6.g4 Kxa4 7.Kc4 Bg5 8.Bd4 Bd2 {0}
> 30260023 2:11.9 0.35 17t 1.Kb7 Bd8 2.Bd4 Kc2 3.Bxg7 Kb3 4.Kc6 d5 5.Kxd5
> Be7 6.g4 Kxa4 7.Ke5 Bg5 8.Ke4 Kb4 9.Be5 {HT} {0}
> 51635056 3:40.5 0.36 17t+ 1.f6 gxf6 2.Kb7 Bd8 3.Kc8 Be7H 4.Be3+H Kd1H
> 5.Kd7H Bf8H 6.Ke8H {HT} {-160}
> 52484144 3:43.8 0.75 17++ 1.f6 gxf6 2.Kb7 Bd8 3.Kc8 d5 4.Kxd8 Kc2
> 53958202 3:49.9 0.99 17t 1.f6 gxf6 2.Kb7 Bd8 3.Kc8 Be7 4.Be3+ Kc2 5.Kd7
> Bf8 6.Ke8 Bg7 7.Kxf7 Bh8 8.Kg8 Kb3 9.Kxh8 Kxa4
> {190}
> 53958212 3:49.9 0.99 17. 1.f6 gxf6 2.Kb7 Bd8 3.Kc8 Be7 4.Be3+ Kc2 5.Kd7
> Bf8 6.Ke8 Bg7 7.Kxf7 Bh8 8.Kg8 Kb3 9.Kxh8 Kxa4
> {190}
> 58136899 4:07.2 1.21 18t 1.f6 gxf6 2.Kb7 Bd8 3.Kc8 Be7 4.Be3+ Kc2 5.Kd7
> Bf8 6.Ke8 Bg7 7.Kxf7 Bh8 8.Kg8 Kb3 9.Kxh8 Kxa4
> 10.g4 {190}
> 82687707 5:51.2 1.21 18. 1.f6 gxf6 2.Kb7 Bd8 3.Kc8 Be7 4.Be3+ Kc2 5.Kd7
> Bf8 6.Ke8 Bg7 7.Kxf7 Bh8 8.Kg8 Kb3 9.Kxh8 Kxa4
> 10.g4 {190}
> 89816865 6:22.0 1.61 19++ 1.f6 gxf6 2.Kb7 Bd8 3.Kc8 Be7 4.Be3+ Kc2 5.Kd7
> Bf8 6.Ke8 d5 7.Kxf8 d4 8.Bxd4 Kb3
> 97608906 6:55.1 1.87 19t 1.f6 g5 2.Kb7 Bd8 3.Bd4 Kc2 4.Kc8 Bxf6 5.Bxf6
> g4 6.Kc7 Kb3 7.Kxd6 Kxa4 8.Ke5 Kb3 9.Kf5 a4
> 10.Kxg4 a3 11.Kf5 {270}
> 130912182 9:12.5 1.87 19. 1.f6 g5 2.Kb7 Bd8 3.Bd4 Kc2 4.Kc8 Bxf6 5.Bxf6
> g4 6.Kc7 Kb3 7.Kxd6 Kxa4 8.Ke5 Kb3 9.Kf5 a4
> 10.Kxg4 a3 11.Kf5 {270}
>
>I am not sure, if Yace sees the right plan. The PVs with around +1 but a
>material score of +1.9 (indicated at the end of the PV in {}) look suspicious.
Correct variation, but 8.Ke7 is the way to go. And maybe Yace would have
played that, gotten so far.
>
>-- Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.