Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 04:21:29 03/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 02, 2001 at 02:14:20, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 02, 2001 at 00:20:20, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On March 01, 2001 at 22:31:24, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>You should look below. Uri has shed some doubt on the draw. >>> >>> Albert >> >>It's a draw, nevermind. > >It was not a draw at least in the game between chessmaster8000 and itself >see http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?156697 > >I did not see a forced line that lead to a draw and the position should be >analyzed to prove if it is a draw or not a draw. > >Uri DIEP says it's a draw and i go for DIEP instead of a forward pruning prog called The King, which probably played on a level similar to 5 0. Did it play Qe3 at the first move anyway? Also Seirawan shows in june 1997 ICCA journal that it's a draw, besides that i did some analysis myself in 1997 and then also concluded it was a draw. So my friend, where your analysis usually are there before anyone has said a word, here you argue lotta GMs and an objective chess prog without anything, how comes?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.