Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Nullmove: when to avoid it?

Author: J. Wesley Cleveland

Date: 10:01:52 03/02/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 01, 2001 at 06:44:58, Severi Salminen wrote:

>>There is another point, unrelated to hashing,
>>which I forgot to mention in my original question.
>>Since we are hoping for fail high, it seems to
>>me obvious that nullmoves are also useless if
>>beta = inf, where inf is the maximum value,
>>used in the largest possible window. Perhaps this
>>is so obvious that nobody mentions it?
>
>Yep, that's true. As Bob said it is very rare to have beta=INF. Actually
>Beta=INF can occur only in the very beginning of the search until we get our
>first real score (score<=INF-Ply). Remember also that you don't have to know
>anything else about the nullmove but whether its score is >=beta. So you can
>search with (-beta,-beta+1)
>
An idea I had, is that since about half the time we expect a move to fail low,
it doesn't make much sense to give the opponent an extra move and expect it to
fail high.




This page took 0.07 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.