Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Valentine's Tourney Complete

Author: Chessfun

Date: 14:37:02 03/03/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 03, 2001 at 15:57:38, Eran wrote:

>On March 03, 2001 at 12:33:30, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>
>>Chess Tiger 13.0, Deep Fritz, Fritz 6, Gambit 1.0, Junior 6, Shredder 5.0.
>>Autoplayed on two TB 900's at 945 mhz with 48 mb hash.
>>All running with native books optimized.
>>Gambit using Gambit.tbk
>>Game 30'/3" inc side, 20 rounds.
>>Fritz 6 is from 12/16/00
>>
>>Tiger 13.0 won the amount of points required to catch Deep Fritz in
>>the final round, but it wasn't quite enough.
>>
>>Crosstable and zipped PGN are available for download.
>>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999
>>
>>Now I'll fool around with the CM for a while especially as the autoplayer
>>seems to work. With the release of the Tiger update my next tourney will
>>include Chessmaster 8000, Chess Tiger 14.0, Deep Fritz, Fritz 6, Gambit 2.0,
>>Shredder 5.0, autoplayed 60'/3" inc. 10 rounds.
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>Since Shredder5 is a knowledge oriented program, it could do better in longer
>time-control matches.

Then it should do better in my next tourney.

>Matches of more than 30 minutes per game really do not need incrementing of
>seconds. It is not necessary, right?

Not necessary, no. But the reason I use it is as both programs have a clock
sometimes due to the autoplayer one clock will say the other program is out of
time, while the other will say it's ok but the other is out of time. So I add a
couple of seconds. Also sometimes the ending can come down to blitz and I don't
want games decided on time.

>Gambit-Soft informed me that Deep Shredder5 could be released next two weeks!
>Interesting to see how strong Deep Shredder5 will be.

I would be interested _if_ it is said to be stronger on a single cpu.

Sarah.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.