Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 17:55:10 03/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2001 at 18:24:33, Martin Müller wrote:
>At ICC with quite a few spectators S5 won clearly in some 40 moves.
>It seems to be true what GM Dreev after the 80 moves win against S5 stated: S5
>has GM strenght.
Let me contribute translating Pablo's comments from spanish to english.
There is a couple of comments about the game that might interest somebody.
Regards,
Miguel
>garompon(GM) says: I dont know what will haepn !
>garompon(GM) says: f6 y rf1 eran muy interesantes tambien
f6 and Rf1 were very interesting too.
>garompon(GM) tells you: segun mis calculos, que perfectamente pueden ser malos,
>creo qeu la maquina dara un jaque perpetuo, como te lo anticipe al
>empezr......si falla sera mate jeje
According to my calculation -that can perfectly be bad- I think that the machine
will give a perpetual, as I anticipated at the beginning... if it fails it will
be checkmate, hehe.
>garompon(GM) says: que opina gm smurskie?
What's gm smurkie's opinion?
>garompon(GM) kibitzes: hi to all!! Thx for watch: I will start my grupal lessons
>those days. Please finger me for more info and message me .Thx :)
>say mate in 10
>(told garompon)
>garompon(GM) tells you: jeje
hehe
>garompon(GM) tells you: espero que eso sea opinion de gm smurskie y no del compu
I hope that's gm smurskie's opinion and not the computer's hehe
>jeje
>say el compo m9+ (:-))
>(told garompon)
>garompon(GM) tells you: yo calcule todas las posibilidades :9 pero estoy viejo y
>puedo fallar hehe
I calculated all the possibilities :9 but I am old and I can fail hehe
>garompon(GM) says: I missed sometighn I will lose
>garompon(GM) says: mate forzado
forced checkmate
>garompon(GM) says: como lo suponia fallo mi calculo, siempre algo se escapa con
>compus
As I supposed, my calculation failed. There is always something that escapes
when facing computers.
>garompon(GM) says: pero jugue muy arriesgado, a ganar como a ti te gusta
But I played risky, to win, as you like.
>{Game 105 (garompon vs. DaroohaLight) garompon resigns} 0-1
>White resigns
>Standard rating adjustment: 2664 --> 2675
>garompon(GM) says: buen juego, no puedo quejarme
Good game, I can't complain.
>garompon(GM) says: a pesar de perder estoy conforme y contento con mi juego y el
>espectaculo
Despite losing, I am happy with my game and the spectacle.
>say que pensas del campion del mundo de los computadores, Shredder 5?
>(told garompon)
What do you think about the Computer World Champion, Shredder 5?
>garompon(GM) tells you: es este quejugo conmigo?
Is the one that played against me?
>say SI
Yes.
>(told garompon)
>say Shredder 5 es el primeiro entre los programmas
>(told garompon)
>garompon(GM) tells you: este que jugo conmigo?
>say que fue tu inpression del juego de S5?
>(told garompon)
What was your impression about S5?
>garompon(GM) tells you: claro que juega bien, pero igual tuve chances porque
>todas las maquinas son materialistas, y cuando ella comio el falco dama, yo
>quede muy bien.....con Tf1 en lugar de fxe6 me gusta mucho mis chances
>garompon(GM) says: entiendes lo que digo?
Of course it plays well, but anyway, I had chances because all the machines are
materialistic, and when she [NOTE from the translator, in spanish computer
is "she"] ate the queen side, I ended up very well. With Rf1 rather than fxe6
I like very much my chances. Do you understand what I mean?
>say si, entiendo
Yes, I understand.
>(told garompon)
>
>
>
>
>[Event "ICC 120 0 r"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "2001.03.04"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "GM Pablo Zarnicki"]
>[Black "Shredder 5"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>
>1. e4 {11:23m} c6 {Buch 0s} 2. d4 {13s} d5 {Buch 0s} 3. e5
>{26s} c5 {Buch 0s} 4. dxc5 {46s} Nc6 {Buch 0s} 5. Bf4
>{3:24m} e6 {Buch 0s} 6. Nd2 {2:22m (c3)} Nge7 {Buch 0s}
>7. Ngf3 {1:27m} Ng6 {Buch 0s} 8. Bg3 {16s} Bxc5 {Buch 0s}
>9. Bd3 {41s} O-O {Buch 0s} 10. Nb3 {2:34m} Bb6 {+0.22/13
>2:40m} 11. Bxg6 {6:39m (O-O)} hxg6 {+0.47/14 2:03m} 12. O-O
>{2:38m (c3)} Bd7 {+0.47/14 4:35m} 13. c3 {2:04m (Dd3)} Ne7
>{+0.48/13 2:00m} 14. Nbd4 {1:56m} Qc7 {+0.40/13 43s}
>15. Ng5 {3:34m (Dd3)} Bxd4 {+0.02/13 10:07m} 16. Qxd4
>{1:20m} Nf5 {0.00/12 7s} 17. Qg4 {1:04m} Rfc8 {+0.01/12
>48s} 18. Qh3 {3:01m} Kf8 {0.00/13 9s} 19. Rad1 {6:28m
>(Lf4)} Qc4 {+0.08/12 1:58m} 20. a3 {2:00m} Ke7 {+0.16/13
>0s} 21. f4 {6:58m (Sh7)} Qe2 {+1.17/12 8:17m} 22. Rfe1
>{2:35m (Lh4)} Qxb2 {+2.61/11 15s} 23. Bh4 {1:43m (Lf2)}
>Qxa3 {+2.85/11 48s} 24. g4 {5:10m (Sf3+)} Nxh4 {+2.43/11
>1:50m} 25. Qxh4 {53s} Ke8 {+2.20/12 1:26m} 26. f5 {2:55m}
>gxf5 {+1.52/12 8:08m} 27. gxf5 {2:18m} Rc4 {+1.60/11 2:22m}
>28. Qh5 {2:46m} Qe7 {+1.60/12 0s} 29. fxe6 {11:27m (Tf1)}
>Bxe6 {+2.43/12 2:37m} 30. Nxe6 {2:09m (Td4)} Qxe6 {+2.80/12
>1:20m} 31. Qh8+ {1:16m (Td4)} Ke7 {+8.97/10 1:25m} 32. Qxa8
>{59s (Dh5)} Qg4+ {+M10/10 1:26m} 33. Kf2 {1:11m} Rf4+
>{+M9/10 3s} 34. Ke3 {13s} Rf3+ {+M8/10 44s} 35. Kd2 {23s}
>Qf4+ {+M7/10 31s} 36. Kc2 {20s} Qa4+ {+M6/11 44s} 37. Kb1
>{1:15m} Qb3+ {+M5/9 0s} 38. Ka1 {50s} Qxc3+ {+M4/7 0s}
>39. Kb1 {31s} Qb4+ {+M3/5 0s} 40. Kc2 {1:06m (Kc1)} Rc3+
>{+M2/3 0s} 41. Kd2 {7:07m} Qb2# {+M1/1 0s} 0-1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.