Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:36:56 03/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 2001 at 03:22:11, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 04, 2001 at 02:06:42, Chuck wrote: > >>In the game, Polgar-Kasparov from this years Linares super tournament, it really >>looked like White was in great danger. I thought Gazza would not quit until >>Judit was well barbecued, but as time wound down, the game ended in a draw. >> >>Judit did a tremendous job of maintaining the initiative, but I believe at some >>point Black had enough to win. In my opinion, the critical position is after >>White's 28th move. There were some alternatives prior to move 28 where >>improvements on Black's play may be found, but after move 28 I think the game is >>a draw. Here's the position at move 28: >> >>[D]2r2rk1/1bq4p/p2b1Pp1/1p3P1N/n2Np2P/2P5/PP3Q2/1K1RR3 b - - 0 28 >> >>Kasparov played 28...gxh5. He didn't have a whole lot of time, but I believe >>there were less risky ways to play and still win. Which brings us to the >>question, does Black have a win? >> >> >> >>Best Regards, >> >>Chuck > >Deep Fritz(pIII800 64Mb hash) after some minutes failed high on Bd5 at depth >12/40 >It solved the fail high after 7 minutes and 15 seconds > >It can see an evaluation of 1.81 pawns for black. >The main line: >1...Bd5 2.Qg2 Qc4 3.Nb3 Nxb2 4.fxg6 Nxd1 5.gxh7+ Kf7 6.Qg7+ Ke8 7.Rd1 > >The previous best move at depth 12 was gxh5 with 1.66 pawns for black so if gxh5 >leads to a draw then it means that the draw was too Deep for Deep Fritz at depth >12. > >Uri The score of Deep Fritz is getting up at depth 13 to 1.84 pawns for black. Main line: 1...Bd5 2.Qg2 Bf7 3.Ng7 Ba3 4.fxg6 hxg6 5.Nge6 Qc4 6.Rxe4 Nxb2 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.