Author: Mike S.
Date: 14:33:35 03/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 2001 at 15:01:31, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >I think this cannot be the point. In my opinion CM needs more than other >programs fast hardware and your results match with others I know. Why not even >admit: CM is a very strong program, not in testing positions but in practical >games. This may be the right track to follow, because most test positions are tactical. It wouldn't be unusual that program's new version has lost some speed, but has gained more practical strength. But one would expect though, that some situations should be found at which - compared to CM6k - the new version makes significantly better positional decisions, shows better knowledge, or the like. Has somebody a comparision between match results of CM6k/CM7k (same engine) and CM8k against the same opponents and under the same conditions? I'm afraid we do not know at the moment, if CM8k performes better that CM6k would, against others that previous version of itself (which may be misleading). Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.