Author: Ed Panek
Date: 14:26:51 03/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2001 at 16:43:10, Chessfun wrote: >On March 06, 2001 at 16:14:41, Ed Panek wrote: > >> Yes hiarcs is very good indeed. For fun try a small 232 tourney in 5 min blitz >>and watch Hiarcs dominate the Tigers. I was using Tiger 13 on a 1245MHZ Athlon >>and Hiarcs 7.32 w TB on a PIII 800EB and Hiarcs 7.32 won my 10 game blitz match >>8-2. >> >>Ed > >I think fun was the right word, but maybe you should have played more games >as I started a blitz tourney at 5 min 3" inc autoplayed on two Cel 433's in >November which was stopped when I got my Tb's so was uncompleted. > >Tiger 13.0 +20 -7 =13 >Hiarcs 7.32 +7 -20 =13 > >Gambit 1.0 +17 -7 =16 >Hiarcs 7.32 +7 -17 =16 > >Sarah. I guess I shouldnt say that Hiarcs would dominate, but in my testing..I run them all the time at various time controls all day.... indicates that Hiarcs seems better than Tiger in quick games even with tiger on faster machine <5min...where Tiger tends to like longer games. I love the way tiger plays though....the other day Gtiger played an obscure opening (cant remember the name) which had its F,G,H pawns out first and its Knight out on H also ...anyways H732 seized the middle and was up by about 4.5 on both evals....Gtiger battled back though and played it out to a draw...almost winning. Ed Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.