Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:45:17 03/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2001 at 16:43:10, Chessfun wrote: >On March 06, 2001 at 16:14:41, Ed Panek wrote: > >> Yes hiarcs is very good indeed. For fun try a small 232 tourney in 5 min blitz >>and watch Hiarcs dominate the Tigers. I was using Tiger 13 on a 1245MHZ Athlon >>and Hiarcs 7.32 w TB on a PIII 800EB and Hiarcs 7.32 won my 10 game blitz match >>8-2. >> >>Ed > >I think fun was the right word, but maybe you should have played more games >as I started a blitz tourney at 5 min 3" inc autoplayed on two Cel 433's in >November which was stopped when I got my Tb's so was uncompleted. > >Tiger 13.0 +20 -7 =13 >Hiarcs 7.32 +7 -20 =13 > >Gambit 1.0 +17 -7 =16 >Hiarcs 7.32 +7 -17 =16 > >Sarah. I suspect that hiarcs simply does not like the celeron 433. It is possible to test it by giving the number of nodes per second of Hiarcs and tiger on the celeron and compare with the number of nodes per second of hiarcs on PIII800 and the number of nodes per second of Tiger on 1245 MHZ Athlon. I suspect that you may find that hiarcs earns more speed and it may help to explain the results. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.