Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 04:40:32 03/17/98
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 1998 at 06:25:55, Ossie Weiner wrote: >Prof. Irazoqui has played about 50 games on P200 MMX machines with Fritz >5 >against strong opponents like Nimzo 98, MChess 7.1, Hiarcs 6 and Rebel >9. >His results are showimg Fritz 5 slightly UNDER 50% which would >correspond >to an Elo rating of around 2520. I played so far 60 games with Fritz 5 at 40 in 2 against the programs you mention. Fritz 5 scored exactly 50%. The margin of error after 60 games is very big. > He has given Fritz 5 all kinds of >advantages (64 - 100 MB RAM, Powerbooks, ...), I gave Fritz 5 no advantages at all. It did play with 100 MB hashtables. All the DOS programs played with the maximum amount of hashtables they allow, between 60 and 63 MB. The exception was Nimzo98. In this case, both, Nimzo98 and Fritz 5 played with 48 MB hashtables because I have only one machine with more than 64 MB RAM. All on P200MMX. I did use the Powerbook. The idea was, and still is, to play all programs at their very best. No advantages to any program in particular. > and still there's no >proof >that it plays any better than its competitors. Ossie, this is getting boringly repetitive. It is you who has to provide proof about the commercial Fritz 5 playing differently than the autoplayer version used by SSDF and by me. As I told you a dozen times, it is easy to check this out. I checked it in some games: same move, same eval, same depth, same time. You refuse to provide proof. All the rest is sheer speculation. So much for that. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.