Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 07:16:05 03/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Manfred, thanks !! Best Frank Interesting is furthermore ... Gandalf 4.32h against other top programs, I know Gandalf 4.32h results on fast hardware but I think I wrote enough about playing strength from Gandalf ! Example: 3.000 games of top programs in a database and know search the fasted attacking games. Winner is ... I like this ! Best Frank On March 07, 2001 at 09:44:59, Manfred Meiler wrote: >Hello Jouni, > >I can't confirm that Gandalf 4.32h is slower than versions 4.32g or 4.32f. > >With my Pentium III 800mhz Gandalf 4.32h scores a little better results in >GS-2930 testsuite. >Look at the following chart (I hope the formating is ok). >According this chart version 4.32h is contrary al little faster than the >pre-versions: > >GS-2930 Gandalf 4.32h Gandalf 4.32g Gandalf 4.32f >Pentium III .exe 25.02.01 .exe 28.11.00 .exe 20.09.00 >800 mhz 64 mb hash 64 mb hash 128 mb hash >256 mb RAM no TableBases no TableBases no TableBases >Windows98 SE GUI Fritz 6 GUI Fritz 6 GUI Fritz 6 > depth solve-t depth solve-t depth solve-t >01)d4-d5 10 439 10 449 10 475 >02)Rf1xf6 11 586 11 587 11 799 >03)Kf3-g3 15 248 15 325 15 324 >04)Bd3xe4 11 383 11 388 11 361 >05)...Ne6-f4+ 9 209 9 211 9 166 >06)Nf3-g5 12 261 12 255 12 207 >07)...d5xc4 12 405 11 240 12 575 >08)Re1-e6 10 408 10 411 10 397 >09)Rd2-d6 16 230 18 766 >=19 1200 >10)Rd6-d1 >=12 1200 >=11 1200 >=12 1200 >11)...Bb4-a5 13 74 13 86 16 1042 >12)Na3xb5 >=17 1200 >=16 1200 >=16 1200 >13)Bb2xg7 >=11 1200 >=11 1200 >=12 1200 >14) c2-c4 14 1200 14 1200 14 1200 > >solved pos. 10 10 9 >time in sec. 8.043 8.518 10.346 >time in min. (GZ) 134,05 141,97 172,43 >ELO GS2930 2.729 2.717 2.671 > >Best regards >Manfred Meiler
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.