Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A *HUGE* THANKS, TO ROBERT HYATT, AND MORE!

Author: Miguel A. Ballicora

Date: 09:49:50 03/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 07, 2001 at 09:52:08, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On March 07, 2001 at 03:51:15, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>I certainly appreciate the kind comments.  But let me remind you that nearly
>30 years ago I was in your shoes.  I had questions.  And I had people like
>Ken Thompson, David Slate, Tom Truscott, Ed Kozdrowicki, Richard Greenblatt,
>Fred Schwartz (if anyone doesn't know the names of the programs those people
>worked on, feel free to ask and I'll respond). and others.  They were _just_
>as willing to help as some are today.
>
>It's just "more of the same"  Or in my case "quid pro quo".

Yes, but since you are thankful of those people, it is also fair
that we are thankful for your contributions.

Let me add something on this thread. In my particular case, I appreciate
much more the time you took to answer to basic questions back in r.g.c.c
than the source code. You were not the only one, I have to be fair, but you
were the one that answered more often.
I used to serach in dejanews a certain topic crossed with hyatt or (3 or 4 other
last names e.g Moreland) and I always got a useful thread. That's how I learned
the basics (i.e everything I know).
I never dreamed of making by myself a computer program. When I started to
read r.g.c.c during the GK-DB match, I started to understand a lot
of messages that contained very pedagogical explanations.
The more I understood, the more curious...

My point is that source codes might play a significant but
limited role. I think that the discussion of programming topics is even more
important.

Regards,
Miguel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.