Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 08:13:21 03/17/98
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 1998 at 11:02:45, Mike Castañuela wrote: >On March 17, 1998 at 07:40:32, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>I played so far 60 games with Fritz 5 at 40 in 2 against the programs >>you mention. Fritz 5 scored exactly 50%. The margin of error after 60 >>games is very big. >> >>I gave Fritz 5 no advantages at all. It did play with 100 MB hashtables. >>All the DOS programs played with the maximum amount of hashtables they >>allow, between 60 and 63 MB. The exception was Nimzo98. In this case, >>both, Nimzo98 and Fritz 5 played with 48 MB hashtables because I have >>only one machine with more than 64 MB RAM. All on P200MMX. >> > >>I did use the Powerbook. The idea was, and still is, to play all >>programs at their very best. No advantages to any program in particular. >> >>Ossie, this is getting boringly repetitive. It is you who has to provide >>proof about the commercial Fritz 5 playing differently than the >>autoplayer version used by SSDF and by me. As I told you a dozen times, >>it is easy to check this out. I checked it in some games: same move, >>same eval, same depth, same time. You refuse to provide proof. All the >>rest is sheer speculation. So much for that. >> >>Enrique > > >With due respect, Mr. Irazoqui, the last message from Mr. Weiner >is very clear and propositive in order to remediate this topic. >I admire too much Fritz, but the statements from Mr. Weiner are >clear, yet, the proposed solution is democratic and elegant. > >What objection do you have to the respect? My objections concern Ossie stating that the Frizt 5 tested by the SSDF and by me (same version) has a different engine and book than the Fritz 5 commercially available. It is a statement based on speculation, not on facts. These facts are easy to get. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.