Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 18:28:22 03/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
> 8/1p6/5Pp1/7p/7k/3p4/7K/8 w - - 0 1
>
> Moravec, 1961
I allready posted a followup to this one. For some reason, I could not believe
the analysis of Yace. I recompiled, started with larger hash (20 MB) - and the
unbelievalbe happened:
nodes time score depth
[many lines with 0.0 score]
9667999 1:13.6 0.00 20. 1.f7 d2 2.f8=Q d1=Q 3.Qf4+ Qg4 4.Qf6+ Qg5
5.Qd4+ Qg4 6.Qf6+ {-240}
10703164 1:21.1 0.40 21++ 1.f7 d2 2.f8=Q g5
19801708 2:22.7 7.00 21t 1.f7 d2 2.f8=Q d1=Q 3.Qf4+ Qg4 4.Qe3 b5 5.Qe7+
Qg5 6.Qe4+ Qg4 7.Qe3 b4 8.Qe7+ Qg5 9.Qxb4+ Qg4
10.Qe7+ Qg5 11.Qe4+ Qg4 12.Qe3 Qe2+ 13.Qxe2 g5
14.Qf3 g4H 15.Qb7H g3+H 16.Kg2H {HT} {841}
20042337 2:24.5 7.00 21. 1.f7 d2 2.f8=Q d1=Q 3.Qf4+ Qg4 4.Qe3 b5 5.Qe7+
Qg5 6.Qe4+ Qg4 7.Qe3 b4 8.Qe7+ Qg5 9.Qxb4+ Qg4
10.Qe7+ Qg5 11.Qe4+ Qg4 12.Qe3 Qe2+ 13.Qxe2 g5
14.Qf3 g4 15.Qb7 g3+ 16.Kg2 {HT} {841}
32871596 4:01.5 7.25 22t 1.f7 d2 2.f8=Q d1=Q 3.Qf4+ Qg4 4.Qe3 b5 5.Qe7+
Qg5 6.Qe4+ Qg4 7.Qe3 b4 8.Qe7+ Qg5 9.Qxb4+ Qg4
10.Qe7+ Qg5 11.Qe4+ Qg4 12.Qe3 Qh3+ 13.Qxh3+
Kg5 14.Qf3 h4 15.Kh3H {HT} {841}
33314343 4:03.9 7.25 22. 1.f7 d2 2.f8=Q d1=Q 3.Qf4+ Qg4 4.Qe3 b5 5.Qe7+
Qg5 6.Qe4+ Qg4 7.Qe3 b4 8.Qe7+ Qg5 9.Qxb4+ Qg4
10.Qe7+ Qg5 11.Qe4+ Qg4 12.Qe3 Qh3+ 13.Qxh3+
Kg5 14.Qf3 h4 15.Kh3 {HT} {841}
52448548 5:41.5 7.39 23t 1.f7 d2 2.f8=Q d1=Q 3.Qf4+ Qg4 4.Qe3 b5 5.Qe7+
Qg5 6.Qe4+ Qg4 7.Qe3 b4 8.Qe7+ Qg5 9.Qxb4+ Qg4
10.Qe7+ Qg5 11.Qe4+ Qg4 12.Qe3 Qh3+ 13.Qxh3+
Kg5 14.Kg3 Kf6 15.Kh4 {HT} {841}
53138865 5:45.3 7.39 23. 1.f7 d2 2.f8=Q d1=Q 3.Qf4+ Qg4 4.Qe3 b5 5.Qe7+
Qg5 6.Qe4+ Qg4 7.Qe3 b4 8.Qe7+ Qg5 9.Qxb4+ Qg4
10.Qe7+ Qg5 11.Qe4+ Qg4 12.Qe3 Qh3+ 13.Qxh3+
Kg5 14.Kg3 Kf6 15.Kh4 {HT} {841}
72398003 7:19.0 7.79 24++ 1.f7 d2 2.f8=Q d1=Q 3.Qf4+ Qg4 4.Qe3 b5 5.Qe7+
Qg5 6.Qe4+ Qg4 7.Qe3 Qg2+ 8.Kxg2 Kg4
I guess this will give me some work.
-- Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.