Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:38:42 03/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 2001 at 13:02:15, Richard Sutherland wrote: >On March 09, 2001 at 14:10:04, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On March 09, 2001 at 13:55:24, Richard Sutherland wrote: >> >>>On March 09, 2001 at 13:31:46, Garry Evans wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Or is this something that is debatable? >>> >>> >>>No, Deep Shredder is. >> >>I saw no convincing evidence for it. >>One tournament when Deep Shredder scored 1/2 point more is not a convincing >>evidence. >> >>Uri > >Maybe not, but, if Deep Fritz had won by half a point you would claim that to be >convincing evidence that it is superior. Right? > >Richard No Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.