Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:02:52 03/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 2001 at 19:48:24, leonid wrote: >On March 10, 2001 at 18:27:05, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On March 10, 2001 at 18:03:46, Ingo Bauer wrote: >> >>>On March 10, 2001 at 08:11:29, leonid wrote: >>> >>>>Hi! >>>> >>>>If you like to solve one light mate then you can try this: >>>> >>>>[D]nqNBNqn1/2QKQ3/Nq3qN1/n1rkr1n1/R1NbN1R1/1n1q1n2/8/Q2B2Q1 w - - >>>> >>>>Please, indicate your result. >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Leonid. >>>Hello >>>This is the Result of Gandalf4.32h on a Celeron@850! The time is nice too! >>> >>>Engine: Gandalf 4.32hUCI >>>von Steen Suurballe >>>Position: >>> 1.05 0:00 -3.88++ 1.S4xf6+ (142.189) 284.3 >>> 1.05 0:00 0.00 1.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 2.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 (275.085) 275.0 >>> 1.06 0:01 +0.01++ 1.S4xb6+ (276.381) 251.2 >>> 1.06 0:01 +0.01 1.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 2.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 (394.592) 263.0 >>> 1.26 0:06 +0.01++ 1.Dgxd4+ (1.879.540) 268.5 >>> 1.26 0:07 +3.60 1.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 2.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 3.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 4.Lxf3+ Sxf3 >>>5.Txd4+ Sbxd4 6.Dexc5+ Ke4 (1.961.678) 268.7 >>> 1.27 0:07 +3.61++ 1.Daxd4+ (1.966.070) 269.3 >>> 1.27 0:07 +3.61 1.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 2.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 3.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 4.Lxf3+ Sxf3 >>>5.Txd4+ Sbxd4 6.Dexc5+ Ke4 (1.969.856) 269.8 >>> 2.01 0:07 +3.60 1.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 2.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 3.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 4.Lxf3+ Sxf3 >>>5.Txd4+ Sbxd4 6.Dexc5+ Ke4 (2.003.867) 267.1 >>> 2.03 0:07 +3.61++ 1.S4xf6+ (2.019.851) 269.3 >>> 2.03 0:07 +5.90++ 1.S4xf6+ (2.022.325) 266.0 >>> 2.01 0:07 +3.60 1.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 2.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 3.Txd4+ Dxd4 4.Lxf3+ Sxf3 >>>5.Dgxd4+ Sbxd4 6.Dexc5+ Ke4 (2.041.855) 268.6 >>> 2.04 0:07 +3.61++ 1.S4xb6+ (2.042.840) 268.7 >>> 2.04 0:07 +3.61 1.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 2.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 3.Txd4+ Dxd4 4.Lxf3+ Sxf3 >>>5.Dgxd4+ Sbxd4 6.Dexc5+ Ke4 (2.052.184) 266.5 >>> 3.01 0:09 +4.09++ 1.S4xf6+ (2.705.746) 270.5 >>> 3.01 0:10 +4.57++ 1.S4xf6+ (2.710.708) 268.3 >>> 3.01 0:10 +5.53++ 1.S4xf6+ (2.749.869) 269.5 >>> 3.01 0:10 +5.90 1.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 2.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 3.Lxf3+ Sxf3 4.Dxb8 Sxg1 >>>5.Sxf8 Txe7+ 6.Sxe7+ Dxe7+ 7.Lxe7 Lxa1 8.Dxa8+ Sc6 (2.872.619) 268.4 >>> 3.02 0:10 +5.91++ 1.S4xb6+ (2.918.454) 267.7 >>> 3.02 0:11 +5.91 1.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 2.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 3.Lxf3+ Sxf3 4.Dxb8 Sxg1 >>>5.Sxf8 Txe7+ 6.Sxe7+ Dxe7+ 7.Lxe7 Lxa1 8.Dxa8+ Sc6 (3.022.499) 267.4 >>> 4.01 0:41 +7.66++ 1.S4xf6+ (11.588.388) 278.5 >>> 4.01 0:42 +9.40++ 1.S4xf6+ (12.001.613) 279.1 >>> 4.01 0:44 +12.89++ 1.S4xf6+ (12.359.861) 279.0 >>> 4.01 0:45 +19.86++ 1.S4xf6+ (12.690.370) 279.5 >>> 4.01 0:45 +33.82++ 1.S4xf6+ (12.757.582) 279.7 >>> 4.01 0:45 +61.72++ 1.S4xf6+ (12.761.755) 279.2 >>> 4.01 0:55 +M8 1.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 2.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 3.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 4.Dxd4+ Sfxd4 >>>5.Dexe5+ Dxe5 6.Dxe5+ Dxe5 7.S8b6+ Sxb6+ 8.Sxb6+ (15.992.615) 288.1 >>> >>>Bye Ingo >> >>Junior5.9 can see mate in 8 after 25 seconds on p200 so the time of Gandalf4.32h >>is not so good. > >This is not that clear. Previous prgoram could look for solution by brute force >and then its time is excellent. But if your program looked by brute force and >found mate in 25 seconds then it is the best for sure. > >Actual time for selective search could be very much below of brute force search. >This is true almost for every position. This position my program solve by brute >force in almost two minutes but take it by selective (also 8 moves) in only two >seconds. > >Leonid. Both Gandalf and Junior are playing programs so they did not look for mate by brute force. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.