Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Testposition(s) - King safety

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 05:07:16 03/11/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 10, 2001 at 18:21:23, Uri Blass wrote:

>It is not clear.

Which is exactly what I was trying to say in the rest of the sentence you
quoted :-) , bm Qa3 for the 1st one and am Qf4 for the 2nd one are clear though
.

>
>White has some other alternatives
>
>Junior5.9 with 5 options considers 1.Qc1 as best but it also considers
>1.Nxe6,1.a4,1.h8Q,1.Bf6 as winning moves
>
>The scores are:
>1.Qc1 15.20/13,15.23/14,15.53/15
>1.Nxe6 13.19/13,13.29/14,12.98/15
>1.h8Q 13.09/13,13.09/14,13.09/15
>1.a4 12.38/13,12.68/14,12.62/15
>1.Bf6 11.16/13,12.38/14,12.98/15
>
>If I give it 7 options it can find that Rxf5 and Nxe4 are also better than +10
>for white.
>
>Uri

How does Junior 5.9 do on Qa3 btw ? I noticed Shredder for example is quite
disappointing .

pete



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.