Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:49:10 03/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2001 at 08:07:16, Peter Berger wrote: >On March 10, 2001 at 18:21:23, Uri Blass wrote: > >>It is not clear. > >Which is exactly what I was trying to say in the rest of the sentence you >quoted :-) , bm Qa3 for the 1st one and am Qf4 for the 2nd one are clear though >. > >> >>White has some other alternatives >> >>Junior5.9 with 5 options considers 1.Qc1 as best but it also considers >>1.Nxe6,1.a4,1.h8Q,1.Bf6 as winning moves >> >>The scores are: >>1.Qc1 15.20/13,15.23/14,15.53/15 >>1.Nxe6 13.19/13,13.29/14,12.98/15 >>1.h8Q 13.09/13,13.09/14,13.09/15 >>1.a4 12.38/13,12.68/14,12.62/15 >>1.Bf6 11.16/13,12.38/14,12.98/15 >> >>If I give it 7 options it can find that Rxf5 and Nxe4 are also better than +10 >>for white. >> >>Uri > >How does Junior 5.9 do on Qa3 btw ? I noticed Shredder for example is quite >disappointing . > >pete Junior5.9 is fast and needs only 3 seconds on p200 to find Qa3 It does not changes its mind and after 49 seconds on p200 it can see mate in 12. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.