Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:29:27 03/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2001 at 10:19:06, leonid wrote: >On March 11, 2001 at 06:24:10, Ingo Bauer wrote: > >>On March 10, 2001 at 19:39:55, leonid wrote: >> >>>On March 10, 2001 at 18:03:46, Ingo Bauer wrote: >>> >>>>On March 10, 2001 at 08:11:29, leonid wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi! >>>>> >>>>>If you like to solve one light mate then you can try this: >>>>> >>>>>[D]nqNBNqn1/2QKQ3/Nq3qN1/n1rkr1n1/R1NbN1R1/1n1q1n2/8/Q2B2Q1 w - - >>>>> >>>>>Please, indicate your result. >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>>Leonid. >>>>Hello >>>>This is the Result of Gandalf4.32h on a Celeron@850! The time is nice too! >>>> >>>>Engine: Gandalf 4.32hUCI >>>>von Steen Suurballe >>>> 4.01 0:55 +M8 1.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 2.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 3.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 4.Dxd4+ Sfxd4 >>>>5.Dexe5+ Dxe5 6.Dxe5+ Dxe5 7.S8b6+ Sxb6+ 8.Sxb6+ (15.992.615) 288.1 >>>> >>>>Bye Ingo >>> >>>What is exactly the time? Did I undestood correctly, 55 sec.? >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Leonid. >> >>Yes. Absolutlely correct! 55 Sekonds on a 850Celeron with 256 MB Hash. I >>repeated this with a deleted *.lrn File and got this result! >> >> 1.05 0:00 -3.88++ 1.S4xf6+ (142.189) 203.1 >> 1.05 0:01 0.00 1.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 2.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 (275.085) 229.2 >> 1.06 0:01 +0.01++ 1.S4xb6+ (276.381) 230.3 >> 1.06 0:01 +0.01 1.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 2.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 (394.592) 232.1 >> 1.26 0:07 +0.01++ 1.Dgxd4+ (1.879.540) 247.3 >> 1.26 0:07 +3.60 1.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 2.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 3.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 4.Lxf3+ Sxf3 >>5.Txd4+ Sbxd4 6.Dexc5+ Ke4 (1.961.678) 245.2 >> 1.27 0:07 +3.61++ 1.Daxd4+ (1.966.070) 245.7 >> 1.27 0:07 +3.61 1.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 2.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 3.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 4.Lxf3+ Sxf3 >>5.Txd4+ Sbxd4 6.Dexc5+ Ke4 (1.969.856) 246.2 >> 2.01 0:08 +3.60 1.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 2.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 3.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 4.Lxf3+ Sxf3 >>5.Txd4+ Sbxd4 6.Dexc5+ Ke4 (2.003.867) 247.3 >> 2.03 0:08 +3.61++ 1.S4xf6+ (2.019.851) 246.3 >> 2.03 0:08 +3.61 1.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 2.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 3.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 4.Lxf3+ Sxf3 >>5.Txd4+ Sbxd4 6.Dexc5+ Ke4 (2.033.815) 245.0 >> 2.04 0:08 +3.61++ 1.S4xb6+ (2.034.800) 245.1 >> 2.04 0:08 +3.61 1.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 2.S4xf6+ Sxf6+ 3.Sxf6+ Dbxf6 4.Lxf3+ Sxf3 >>5.Txd4+ Sbxd4 6.Dexc5+ Ke4 (2.044.134) 246.2 >> 3.01 0:10 +4.09++ 1.Dgxd4+ (2.677.179) 247.8 >> 3.01 0:10 +4.57++ 1.Dgxd4+ (2.679.106) 248.0 >> 3.02 0:14 +3.13++ 1.S4xb6+ (3.644.349) 253.0 >> 3.02 0:14 +5.53++ 1.S4xb6+ (3.649.833) 253.4 >> 3.01 0:14 +5.90 1.S4xb6+ Sxb6+ 2.Sxb6+ Dfxb6 3.Lxb3+ Sxb3 4.Dxf8 Sxa1 >>5.Sxb8 Txc7+ 6.Sxc7+ Dxc7+ 7.Lxc7 Lxg1 8.Dxg8+ Se6 (3.759.666) 252.3 >> 3.03 0:15 +5.91++ 1.S4xf6+ (3.831.823) 252.0 >> 3.03 0:15 +5.91 1.S4xb6+ Sxb6+ 2.Sxb6+ Dfxb6 3.Lxb3+ Sxb3 4.Dxf8 Sxa1 >>5.Sxb8 Txc7+ 6.Sxc7+ Dxc7+ 7.Lxc7 Lxg1 8.Dxg8+ Se6 (3.961.528) 252.3 >> 4.01 0:43 +7.66++ 1.S4xb6+ (11.124.898) 255.7 >> 4.01 0:44 +9.40++ 1.S4xb6+ (11.472.706) 256.0 >> 4.01 0:45 +12.89++ 1.S4xb6+ (11.718.901) 256.4 >> 4.01 0:47 +19.86++ 1.S4xb6+ (12.164.876) 256.6 >> 4.01 0:47 +33.82++ 1.S4xb6+ (12.303.907) 257.4 >> 4.01 0:47 +61.72++ 1.S4xb6+ (12.308.895) 256.9 >> 4.01 0:58 +M8 1.S4xb6+ Sxb6+ 2.Sxb6+ Dfxb6 3.Dgxd4+ Dxd4 4.Dxd4+ Sbxd4 >>5.Dexc5+ Dbxc5 6.Dxc5+ Dxc5 7.S8f6+ Sxf6+ 8.Sxf6+ (15.640.705) 266.9 >> >>Quite equal! >> >>Bye Ingo > >Thanks! Time is excellent! For this position even 5 minutes will be pretty good. > >Leonid. I do not think that 5 minutes is good for this position. It is not bad for brute force but the position was solved by a playing program that use extensions. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.