Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 09:51:22 03/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2001 at 12:43:39, Ernst Walet wrote: >On March 11, 2001 at 12:39:16, Ernst Walet wrote: > >>On March 11, 2001 at 10:02:31, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>> >>>Nxg6 seems to be the best move, but not so much better than bxc4 or Nhxf5, or so >>>Deep Fritz says after 16 iterations: >>> >>>New position >>>2r2rn1/p3q1bk/n2p2pp/1b1PPp2/1pp2P1N/1P2N1P1/P1QB2BP/4RRK1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by DEEP FRITZ : >>> >>>1. +- (3.28): 1.Nxg6 cxb3 2.Nxf8+ Qxf8 3.Qxb3 Bxf1 4.Rxf1 dxe5 5.fxe5 Bxe5 >>>6.Rxf5 Bf6 >>>2. +- (2.56): 1.bxc4 Bd7 2.Bh3 Qd8 3.Nxg6 Kxg6 4.e6 Bxe6 5.dxe6 Bd4 6.Bxf5+ Kg7 >>>3. +- (2.03): 1.Nhxf5 cxb3 2.Qe4 Nc5 3.Qxb4 gxf5 4.Qxb5 Rb8 5.Qc4 bxa2 6.Qc2 >>> >>>(Irazoqui, Cadaqués 11.03.2001) >> >> >>Enrique, can you tell how long it took Deep Fritz to complete 16 ply here? >> >>Ernst. > >To say it better, how long did it take DF to see Nxg6 as the best move? It didn't see it in 10 minutes. Then I forced the Nxg6 variation and went back and forth. >I >assume you used your dual with 512MB hash? Yes. Now is finishing ply 17 after almost 4 hours. New position 2r2rn1/p3q1bk/n2p2pp/1b1PPp2/1pp2P1N/1P2N1P1/P1QB2BP/4RRK1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by DEEP FRITZ : 1. +- (3.28): 1.Nxg6 cxb3 2.Nxf8+ Qxf8 3.Qxb3 Bxf1 4.Rxf1 dxe5 5.fxe5 Bxe5 6.Rxf5 Bf6 2. +- (2.56): 1.bxc4 Bd7 2.Bh3 Qd8 3.Nxg6 Kxg6 4.e6 Bxe6 5.dxe6 Bd4 6.Bxf5+ Kg7 3. +- (2.13): 1.Nexf5 cxb3 2.Qe4 Nc5 3.Nxe7 Nxe4 4.Nxc8 Nxd2 5.Rf2 dxe5 6.Nxa7 exf4 (Irazoqui, Cadaqués 11.03.2001) >Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.