Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:54:44 03/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2001 at 12:53:13, James T. Walker wrote:
>On March 11, 2001 at 12:22:55, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On March 11, 2001 at 09:39:39, Michael P. Nance Sr. wrote:
>>
>>>After reading previous comments conserning the formentioned Topic,please allow
>>>Me to interject My 2 cents into the argument.Let me coin an old saying ,(good
>>>things are worth waiting for),I've found this to be a reality.As for one being
>>>superior to the other,let Me assert another clushe',(only time will tell).We
>>>will all be anticipating the SSDF ratings.On the Issue of Rebel allowing
>>>Registered users to obtain the updated Version at no cost,this is a good
>>>barameter of Thier worthy intentions.Did Chessbase offer Deep fritz for free or
>>>at lease a deminished cost to Owners of Fritz 6 ?
>>
>>
>>
>>ChessBase published Fritz6a, which was an improved version of the original
>>Fritz6, for free.
>>
>>Just to be honest, I must mention it.
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> One Issue that needs to be
>>>reconciled is the Programs learing ability.May-be its in the works,only Mother
>>>Nature knows.In conclusion,negative comments from any Party doesn't help matters
>>>at all. kind regards,Michael
>
>
>Yes Christophe, but the original Fritz6 on the CD looked like something out of
>the "junk box" just to put on the CD. Fritz 6a was a significant improvement
>within a month so what does that say about the original Fritz 6?? I don't
>believe the original Fritz 6 was the result of a year of work which was then
>given a significant update within a month.
>Jim
That's right. I don't know what happened with the original version of Fritz6.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.