Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 04:58:03 03/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 1998 at 23:39:07, José Berdiñas Bonefua wrote: >I do not share your point of sight. >With a discreet engine , a good book tuning ( many previous games) and a >good book "learning" , a program can be today the number 1 in SSDF list >; but surely never will win a WMCCC , because will lose with the >"unknown" programs. Speculations, speculations... Facts prove exactly the opposite. 0.6% of the SSDF games played between today's best programs are doubles. This is not statistically significant. All programs come with books tuned for the lines they play best. Very many auto232 games are being played with this purpose. All programs come now with these learners. As a result, the difference you see in ratings reflect the strength of engines. >I ask to you, So that serves us then the SSDF????. To the same purpose it always did: to show the relative strength of programs in computer-computer form. >Any similarity with Fritz 5 is pure coincidence.!!! And from where do you get this? Any proof? Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.