Author: liam hearns
Date: 16:41:01 03/12/01
i find j6a much more accurate in position evaluation in the end game then fritz or hiarcs,i think it has a truer understanding of drawing eg. giving up a bishop for a pawn in a bishop or nite pawn ending therefore i trust it more in analyse.i have not received my tiger/rebel which is in the post but am looking forward to comparisons.as this is the most difficult part of the game for prgs.i think it is a good yardstick.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.