Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: evaluation of positions

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 07:41:15 03/13/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 12, 2001 at 19:41:01, liam hearns wrote:

>i find j6a much more accurate in position evaluation in the end game then fritz
>or hiarcs,i think it has a truer understanding of drawing eg. giving up a bishop
>for a pawn in a bishop or nite pawn ending therefore i trust it more in
>analyse.i have not received my tiger/rebel which is in the post but am looking
>forward to comparisons.as this is the most difficult part of the game for prgs.i
>think it is a good yardstick.

did you already try shredder in the endgame?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.