Author: pjt
Date: 12:11:06 03/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 13, 2001 at 04:20:37, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On March 12, 2001 at 22:50:19, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On March 11, 2001 at 12:58:52, Stefan Fredriksson wrote: >> >>>On March 10, 2001 at 13:03:19, Richard Sutherland wrote: >>> >>>>On March 09, 2001 at 14:27:37, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or is this something that is debatable? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No, Deep Shredder is. >>>>>> >>>>>It depend on what time control, Shredder is worse than even Fritz6e on blitz >>>>>time control of less than 30 minutes per sides. >>>>> >>>>>Pichard. >>>>> >>>> >>>>We're talking about strongest CHESS program, not, blitz program. >>>> >>>>Richard >>> >>>Huh? Are you saying that blitz is not chess? The we could equally draw the line >>>and say that computerchess is not chess. >>> >>>Ofcourse its chess.... >> >>By the same token, throwing a bucket of paint against a wall is also art. > >But it is, Dann, it certainly is. Painters throwing a fried egg on the canvas, >composers holding a transparent pentagram against the window and writing a note >in the position of each star they see... ART! > >Once I saw a T-shirt with this on it: "This piece of shit is a piece of art." :) > >Enrique > >>I must begrudginly admit that blitz is chess. >>Ugly, putrid, artless, pathetic... >>But chess. Blitz and bullet are nothing more than video games :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.