Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:10:17 03/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 13, 2001 at 16:27:33, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On March 13, 2001 at 11:50:12, James Swafford wrote: > >>> >>> Why not just admitt that Tiger is the Better Program?? >> >> >>Oh boy. Those sound like fighting words. The gauntlet has been >>thrown. The challenge has been issued. :-) >> >>I don't know which is the better program. Perhaps one is >>better in some areas? It'd be neat to see them "throw down" >>under conditions agreeable to both authors. >> >>I do have to agree with Bob that Crafty was handicapped under >>the conditions it played under. Why not do the match the right >>way? Bragging rights to the winner... >> >>-- >>James > >If your talking about the best program then crafty must play on a level playing >ground, meaning no quad exeon's just one cpu. This then would be fair. I already >know the answer tho. >respectful > >Wayne Why is that your definition of "fair". Opponent can't use more than one cpu so neither can? Opponent doesn't have book learning so neither can? etc??? There are _lots_ of dual-cpu machines on ICC nowadays... _lots_.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.