Author: Andreas Stabel
Date: 02:35:07 03/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2001 at 05:17:37, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 14, 2001 at 05:03:21, Eelco de Groot wrote: > >>On March 14, 2001 at 04:48:47, Graham Laight wrote: >> >>>Which computer is this? >>> >>>On March 14, 2001 at 04:15:34, Eelco de Groot wrote: >>> >>>>Computers these days..I don't understand them anymore. Computer with Black has >>>>played against me, Blitzlevel, >>>> >>>>1.h4 d5 2.d4 Bg4 3.f3 Bf5 4.g4 Bc8 * and thinks with Black it is fine at +0.20. >>>> >>>>Maybe it is right?! >>>> >>>> >>>>[D]rnbqkbnr/ppp1pppp/8/3p4/3P2PP/5P2/PPP1P3/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 >> >>It is Gambit Tiger 1.0, Graham. But it would have to be either at extreme Blitz >>or at 5 seconds fixed per move to play this, else it chooses 2. ..e6. I must >>confess these Bishop moves were worrying me quite a bit last night but 2. ..Bg4 >>can't be all bad because even Century 3.0 plays it! > >It proves nothing because Rebel Century3 may be wrong and I do not understand >the "even Century3" because there is no evidence that century3 is better than >other programs. > >Uri Couldn't this be caused by aggressive king safety evaluation. The computers think they have weakened white's king safety by theese moves, so they think they are fine. Andreas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.