Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hypermodern strategy

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 11:22:11 03/14/01

On March 14, 2001 at 08:48:43, José Carlos wrote:

>On March 14, 2001 at 04:15:34, Eelco de Groot wrote:
>
>>Computers these days..I don't understand them anymore. Computer with Black has
>>played against me, Blitzlevel,
>>
>>1.h4 d5 2.d4 Bg4 3.f3 Bf5 4.g4 Bc8 * and thinks with Black it is fine at +0.20.
>>
>>Maybe it is right?!
>>
>>
>>[D]rnbqkbnr/ppp1pppp/8/3p4/3P2PP/5P2/PPP1P3/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
>
>  I think white is worse than 0.20 in this position. Remember pawns cannot move
>backwards... and white has created too many weaknesses here.
>  IMHO, white is lost in this position.
>
>  José C.

Lost? White has captured a lot of space on the K-side at no cost in time. Black
is cramped here. This somehow balanced by the weaknesses you speak of, so it is
by no means clear. "Lost" requires proof. Where is the proof?

Re: Hypermodern strategy José Carlos 01:14:52 03/15/01
- Re: Hypermodern strategy Uri Blass 01:48:39 03/15/01
  - Re: Hypermodern strategy José Carlos 05:15:49 03/15/01
    - Re: Hypermodern strategy Albert Silver 06:31:16 03/15/01
      - I'd be happy to play an email game from this position... José Carlos 08:00:01 03/15/01
      - I'd be happy to play an email game from this position... José Carlos 06:52:55 03/15/01
        
        I accept. Albert Silver 07:55:25 03/15/01
        
        Sorry for the repeated post ;) José Carlos 08:02:17 03/15/01
Re: Hypermodern strategy Daniel Chancey 15:27:30 03/14/01
Re: Hypermodern strategy Dan Andersson 12:10:38 03/14/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.